1 Majinn

Indo Us Nuclear Deal Essay Examples

Target PT 2018 Online Classes Batch - 2

Complete Revision through MCQs, Program will start from 15th March, 2018 . Click here for Course details & Online admission.

Introduction

India did not sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and exploded its first nuclear weapon in 1974. Consequently, the United States stopped supply of nuclear materials to India in 1978. For thirty years, there was no cooperation between the two countries on uses of atomic energy.  Subsequently, India developed its indigenous nuclear industry.

The US signed a historic deal with India in 2008 to resume supply of nuclear technology and materials. The treaty was inoperative for more than six years for two reasons: (i) insistence of Washington on tracking of nuclear materials and (ii) the supplier's liability in the event of a nuclear accident.

The recent nuclear deal between India and the US removes both the hurdles and paves the way for US suppliers to build nuclear power plants in India. According to the deal, the US will not track nuclear materials in India but the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will apply safeguards to all of its civilian nuclear installations.

At present, all international conventions make the operators of nuclear power plants liable for damages, regardless of the cause of the accident. The maximum liability of the operator is usually limited to $300 million. The state takes responsibility for damages exceeding this limit. It may be noted that the costs of damages are likely to exceed $100 billion in both the nuclear disasters in Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Failing to get adequate compensation from the plant supplier after the world's worst industrial disaster in Bhopal in 1984, Indian parliament passed the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act, 2010 which makes suppliers of equipment liable for nuclear damages. Russia, which built two nuclear power reactors in Kudankulam in India, agreed to accept the supplier's liability for building two more reactors at the same site.

Under the new deal, the US agreed to provide insurance coverage for nuclear damages to the suppliers of nuclear power plants. Since the US ban, Russia had been the only foreign supplier of nuclear power plants to India. Now, the USA is ready to enter into this lucrative market. France may also follow the suit. The participation of the western suppliers may encourage competition and result in a positive impact on both quality and costs of nuclear power plants in India.

Analysis of Impact of Obama’s Visit on the Nuclear Deal:

In a visit heavy on pageantry and symbolism, the India-US civil nuclear deal took center-stage, with the two sides announcing a breakthrough to start implementing it commercially - a development that could potentially open the path for
Japan and Australia to sign nuclear deals with India.

The importance of supplier liability is illustrated by the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011. When the reactors were hit by the tsunami that year, the weakness of the General Electric (GE) Mark I design was cruelly exposed. The reactors’ inadequate containment was unable to prevent the spread of radioactivity when the cooling systems failed and pressure built up inside the reactors. Although this design defect was first noted about 40 years ago, just as the Fukushima reactors were commissioned, the industry resisted regulatory changes that could have amended the disaster.

The Japan Center for Economic Research estimated that the cost of cleanup at Fukushima may reach $200 billion. A 2013 expert study published in the journal Energy and Environmental Science estimated that the disaster may lead to about a thousand excess deaths due to cancer. However, it is unlikely that GE will ever be held accountable for its poor design choice. Under Japanese law, the supplier is protected from liability for an accident. This is the framework of exemption under which nuclear suppliers like to operate.

Legal indemnity for suppliers creates a "moral hazard" - encouraging suppliers to take excessive risks since they don’t have to pay for the consequences. The case of GE not strengthening the Mark I containment is not an exception. The Presidential commission appointed to study the 1979 Three Mile Island disaster, which saw a partial nuclear meltdown, pointed out that the supplier, Babcock and Wilcox, was already aware of design defects that contributed to the accident, but never bothered to resolve them.

Nevertheless, suppliers have ferociously defended their privilege of being free of liability, and they exerted tremendous pressure on the Indian government when the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act was framed in 2010. Contrary to the industry’s propaganda, this is not a "tough" law. Indeed, several clauses in the law were directly lifted from an annex to the "Convention on Supplementary Compensation," created by the U.S. government to benefit its nuclear industry.

 The law channels primary liability for an accident to the operator — the public sector Nuclear Power Corporation of India - and caps it at Rs. 1,500 crores. This overrides the absolute liability judgment of the Supreme Court, passed after the Bhopal gas leak disaster, which had no such limit. The cap is about a thousand times smaller than estimates of the damage that a serious nuclear accident could cause. Therefore, the law is designed to protect the financial interests of the operators and the supplier; victims or the taxpayers will simply have to bear costs beyond this cap.

Multinational suppliers are unhappy because a relatively minor clause allows the operator to recoup this compensation. By the scales of nuclear commerce, the amount of money involved is minuscule. A single reactor may cost up to an estimated Rs. 60,000 crores - 40 times the maximum amount the supplier could be liable for. The figures of each unit have been arrived at from studying plants under construction in Finland and France. If imposing liability on suppliers leads to cost increases, it can only mean that they are using the law as an excuse to escalate prices.

A close reading of the statements made by advocates of their interests reveals what suppliers are really concerned about: the Indian law could set a precedent that could undermine the unfair international system of exemption that they enjoy. "If litigants were able to file suit against suppliers, essentially it could destroy the whole industry," declared Ashley Tellis, an American negotiator for the nuclear deal.

The United Progressive Alliance government repeatedly tried to subvert the law, earning a sharp rebuke from Arun Jaitley who wrote in 2013 that "a leopard never changes its spots. The government's intention to dilute the right of recourse … [has] continued." He should explain why his own government is pursuing a similar policy. The current proposal of using a "legal memorandum" to reinterpret the law is similar to the UPA’s attempt to sign away its "right of recourse" on various pretexts.

The most baffling feature of the current agreement is that it holds no tangible benefits for India. The United States has offered to sell two reactor designs - both of which are expensive and untested. The Westinghouse AP1000, which has been chosen for Mithi Virdi (Gujarat) is not in commercial operation anywhere and has encountered difficulties wherever it is being built. At Plant Vogtle, in the U.S. state of Georgia, Westinghouse and its partner Georgia Power have sued each other for a billion dollars over cost increases and delays. Even in China, the AP1000 has been delayed by about two years because of problems with reactor coolant pumps.

Even less can be said for GE's Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR), selected for Kovvada (Andhra Pradesh). After years of questions about ESBWR's steam dryer, the design obtained regulatory approval from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - the first step before construction can commence - only in September 2014. There are no firm orders for the ESBWR.

The Vogtle plants were initially estimated to cost about $7 billion apiece. Even accounting for lower construction costs in India we showed - in a detailed study "Cost of Electricity from the Jaitapur Nuclear Power Plant" published in the Economic and Political Weekly - could translate into electricity tariffs that are as high as Rs. 15 per unit. If the government is looking for cheap electricity to promote development, importing American reactors hardly seems like a smart choice.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Barack Obama discussed methods of circumventing the Indian nuclear liability law to protect American reactor suppliers from the consequences of accidents caused by design defects. Although public details are scarce, if they have indeed reached an understanding on the issue, then this is not a cause for celebration; it should be a matter of deep concern.

By: Dr. Piyush Chaubey

Political Science Test Series Preview
By Dr. Piyush Chaubey

How to attempt contemporary topics along with trend analysis & test series preview
» Date: 16th February 2015
» Timing: 2:00 PM
» Place: Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi

Online registration open at:http://iasscore.in/workshop-registration.php

MBAUniverse.com has started an expert series of GD PI WAT preparation for MBA Admission 2014. This series of articles will help aspirants prepare for their GD PI WAT by providing valid contents, probable topics and experts’ advice to help them succeed during admission process at various B schools.

This essay on the Topic Indo – US relations; how much beneficial for India?” will provide inputs for your WAT round.


WAT Topic for MBA: 12 days left for XAT Essay writing; fasten your belts

XAT 2014: 8 key points for effective Essay Writing

XAT 2014 Essay Writing and WAT in IIMs: Role, Importance and Weightage

XAT 2014 & WAT: Know 10 Important Don'ts for Essay writing

WAT Topic for MBA: FDI in multi brand retail is a boon or bane

In the issues related to its foreign policy vis a vis Asia-Pacific region United States of America cannot undermine the growing influence of India and also its economic prowess. The Indo-US relationship has been transformed from a bilateral one to a strategic partnership. It is believed that it takes growing influence of India to counter the rising influence of China which is the only power in the present uni polar world which to some extent can stand near the global influence of US. Being a nuclear power and rising economic powerhouse of South Asia, the importance and relevance of India cannot be ignored by the world powers. US have increasingly been looking upon India and its growing influence as an alternative to Chinese hegemony in the region. Currently India tops the US’ priority list for its regional designs.

The disintegration of USSR has seen many shifts in US’ interest towards India, as a result of which India’s proximity with US has raised many folds in the last couple of decades. The US has emphasized time and again that it wants to see India as a great power. As per former US Ambassador to India, David C Mulford, “The US is in favor of a decisively broader strategic relationship to help India achieve its goals as one of the world's great multi-ethnic democracies. The vision embraces cooperation on a global strategy for peace, defence, energy, and economic growth”.

There has been a little basic shift in US relation towards India which cannot be missed while talking about Indo-US relations.

Civilian Nuclear Technology

Since last three decades India was denied access to civil nuclear technology. But the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Agreement which was signed in 2008 gave India access to the same. The signing of the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Agreement has been regarded as a major step towards Next Step in Strategic Partnership.

Indo –US Defence Cooperation Agreement

In September 2013, the Obama administration in an unprecedented manner through a joint declaration agreed to cut through American laws that have been inhibiting a full-fledged defence partnership between the two countries. Such a provision is provided only to close allies of the US like South Korea and Turkey. The joint declaration also took note of India’s acceptance of an invite to participate in RIMPAC, a U.S.-organized naval exercise in which nearly two dozen nations are expected to participate. India has already participated in the Malabar, Red Flag and Yudh Abhyas joint military exercises with the U.S.

America’s Interest to see India as an Asia Pacific power

Time and again the United States has been emphasizing that it wants India to become a great power in the near future. The reason behind is rising influence of China in the region which America always looks upon as a threat to its global hegemony. US think that no country in the region can act as a counter to Chinese influence as powerfully as India.

Hence India can act great player in the balance of power in the unipolar world.

America’s interest in Indian market and economy

Since last two decades Indian economy and the market has always been attracting US and other big economies. Recently the United Nations estimated that the Indian economy is expected to rise with a growth rate of 5.3 per cent in 2014. Major US investors are willing to invest in India due to its rising economic prowess post liberalization.

A critical look

The Indo- US relations are not at all free from scrutiny based on past American record of strictly adhering to its own interests when it comes to dealing with other countries. Some of the intellectuals like Arundhati Roy are of the view that America doesn’t have any permanent friend or enemy, rather it only has permanent interests. They are of the view that India must not allow itself to become a pawn in the US’s China containment strategy. They also think that the US’ attempts to enlist India in its new balancing strategy are essentially aimed at serving its own interests.

Click here to score high marks in GD PI WAT at Top B school for Admission 2014: http://www.mbauniverse.com/gd_pi_preparation/gd_preparation.php

With the absence of the "balancing factors" that existed earlier, with Russia, the European Union and the United States losing their prominence in the world economy, to expect America to stand up in India’s fight if it is at the receiving end will be erroneous. So, India needs to opt for a self interest driven course and build the bilateral relationship on broader congruence of interests and shared values without countering America’s regional ambitions.

There are some issues on which both US and India differ like climate change, outsourcing, Nuclear Non- proliferation Treaty (NPT), Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) and India’s approach towards Iran which has been reeling under constant economic sanctions since last 34 years after the Islamic Revolution there.

With the growing American interest in India and its economy there is a need for India to adopt a cautious and calculated policy posture vis a vis many issues of mutual concern for both the countries.

GD Topic for MBA: What India gained at the WTO DOHA Round

GD Topic for MBA: New Lokpal will be effective in curbing corruption

GD Topics: Gender bias in portraying Women in Advertisements

GD Topic for MBA: RBI's new governor has taken adequate steps to improve Indian Economy

GD Topic for MBA: Corruption is the root cause for Indian Economy slowdown

GD Topic for MBA: The rise in vegetable prices is a man made farce

GD Topic for MBA: Opinion Polls be banned in pre election period

GD Topic for MBA: Should business lobbying be made legal in India?

GD Topics: Will India remain way behind China?

Click here to score high marks in GD PI WAT at Top B school for Admission 2014: http://www.mbauniverse.com/gd_pi_preparation/gd_preparation.php

To read the admission policies of the IIMs at MBAUniverse.com, click on the following links:
IIM Ahmedabad Admission criteria 2014-16

IIM Bangalore Admission criteria 2014-16

IIM Calcutta Admission Criteria 2014-16

IIM Lucknow Admission Criteria 2014-16

IIM Kozhikode Admission Criteria 2014-16

IIM Indore Admission Criteria 2014-16

IIM Shillong Admission Criteria 2014-16

IIM Tiruchirappalli Admission Criteria 2014-16

GD PI WAT Preparation for MBA Admission 2014

Know 10 Important Don'ts for Essay writing

GD Topics: Will India remain way behind China?

GD Topic for MBA: Should business lobbying be made legal in India?

8 key points for effective Essay Writing

GD PI: Importance and Role of Group Discussion in MBA Admission 2014

GD Preparation: 7 Effective Do's to win GD for MBA admission

Personal Interview: Model questions & answers for MBA Admission 2014

GD PI: 10 important Personal Interview tips for MBA Admission 2014

Essay Writing and WAT in IIMs : Role, Importance and Weightage

Other MBA Exams Preparation

XAT 2014 Decision Making: Focused approach & practice questions for this crucial section

XAT 2014: 30 minutes Verbal Error correction on Articles

NMAT 2014 Exam pattern, Paper pattern and Test schedule

SNAP 2013: Analytical Ability can fetch 33% marks in SNAP 2013

IBSAT 2013: ICFAI B Schools, IBSAT 2013 exam Pattern and key dates

CMAT 2014: Dates announced, exams to start from Feb 20, 2014

MAH CET 2014 Exam pattern and updates

MICAT 2014: Admission Criteria and Test Pattern

Stay tuned to MBAUniverse.com for articles on Probable WAT Topics for MBA Admission 2014

Leave a Comment

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *